ML10
Martin-Latimer Type 10
Criswell - GA CR15
Serial # 14129
Plate: K
Rarity: R1
Grade: UNC
Note: Missing top border, clean stamp for this variety
ML10
Martin-Latimer Type 10
Criswell - GA CR15
Serial # 216
Plate: G
Rarity: R1
Grade: AU
Note: This is a remainder and falsely filled in. The Serial No doesn’t match the signature pairs found in the Martin-Latimer Reference guide. Apparently someone identified this as fake and wrote ‘spurious’ on the note…whether this was done during the civil war or 10 years ago, who knows. Don’t pay too much (like me) if you see one of these offered…I’ve seen multiples
ML10
Martin-Latimer Type 10
Criswell - GA CR15
Serial # 53614
Plate: F
Rarity: R1
Grade: F
Note: Ugly note, but I bought it because of the stamp on back. I’d love to say that it was stamped; however, more than likely, this is simply ink transference from another ink-heavy stamp
ML10
Martin-Latimer Type 10
Criswell - GA CR15
Serial # 48709
Plate: H
Rarity: R1
Grade: UNC
Note: Now that I look at the other Type 10’s in my collection, I note that this note is my only clean example with 4 borders in UNC condition
ML10
Martin-Latimer Type 10
Criswell - GA CR15
Serial # 8000
Plate: K
Rarity: R1
Grade: XF
Note: Another remainder which has been falsely filled in. While the names are accurate, they don’t match the signature combinations in the Martin-Latimer reference guide. Someday, I hope to find a Type 10 or 11 with a missing Treasury stamp
ML10
Martin-Latimer Type 10
Criswell - GA CR15
Serial # 491
Plate: R
Rarity: R1
Grade: VF
Note: This is a remainder and falsely filled in. The Serial No doesn’t match the signature pairs found in the Martin-Latimer Reference guide. Apparently someone identified this as fake and wrote ‘spurious’ on the note…whether this was done during the civil war or 10 years ago, who knows. Don’t pay too much (like me) if you see one of these offered…I’ve seen multiples